You see it everywhere.The
need is to seek to know what the Divine principle is in any matter.
Has
God revealed His own thought and mind?...
Then I Must Not Pursue Some Other Way on the ground that the Lord has blessed and the Lord has used
that other way.
That was true of Saul; that was true of Jonathan.
But
there came a point at which an ultimate issue was raised on principle by
the revealing of God's full mind.
Now I cannot argue that because
people have been blessed and used of the Lord though they have not at
given times and in given ways stood for that full mind, therefore it is
not necessary for me to be abandoned to God's full thought.
That is
human argument. We must not do it.
The Lord blesses when the heart is
wholly for Him, but that does not mean that everything is there that He
wants.
The very people whom He is using He will presently bring to see
something more of His will and how much more deeply His thoughts go.
Then it is no less an issue than Amalek...
Human judgment must be utterly
put away, in the light of the Divine mind then revealed.
I
have no doubt you can see through what I am saying a great deal more...
If you do not grasp the whole thing, just take this as a guiding lesson
in life, that where Divine fullness is concerned, the fact that the Lord
blesses does not warrant us in arguing that we can stay in a certain
position, that there is nothing more required.
The point is, has the
Lord revealed something more than is actually represented in the sphere
where we have known His blessing?
If so, it is for us to go on in the
light of all that the Lord has revealed, and take the consequences.
In
the end it will be seen whether the principle was vindicated by God.
This
story of Jonathan is, I say, a terribly pathetic and tragic story.
No
doubt he had a good argument for what he did, but he certainly did not
argue from the heavenly standpoint.
He did not say, 'God has made it
perfectly clear that it is through David that His full purpose is to be
realized.
I knew from the beginning that David was the anointed, and not
my father; I have had it confirmed again and again...
I told David that
he was going to have the throne and the kingdom; my heart is with him...
And yet he is out there in the wilderness and I am here with my father.
What am I doing here?
He did not argue, 'That is the direction in which
the Lord's full purpose lies; it is for me to be there.'
He doubtless
had his arguments and his reasons and could probably have been very
plausible as to why he was still sticking to his father and to the
kingdom from which God had departed.
He Was Compromising...
His Loyalty Was Divided...
And He Was Involved In The Tragedy.
It
is a fresh call to us to act on principle with the Lord and not to
argue from any other standpoint, on any other ground.
We must say, 'What
has the Lord revealed?
It will mean this, it will cost that, it will
involve me thus; but that is not the point.
I am not going to be
influenced or governed by consequences at all.
Policy must have no place
with me.
What God has revealed - that is the only argument for me.
So
Amalek became the occasion for bringing up the whole question of
obedience to the Lord, involving the necessity for the setting aside of a
great deal of natural judgment.
Hath the Lord as great delight in
burnt-offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord?
1Sa 15:22 And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.
Beyond all outward observance and profession, the LORD looks for Full and Uncompromising Obedience to His Revealed Will.